Pandora's Noah's Ark Box

Why Is This Important Now And What Can You Photograph As Evidence?

The word ‘kundalini’ does not mean ‘coiled snake.’ It means an annulus.

And that will become particularly important in a moment.

The modern-day private Monroe Institute’s patented discovery about the brainwave addition that the human brain creates, when it is confronted with slightly different electromagnetic frequency inputs on either side of the head, is something that you can certainly take EMF pictures of. Initially – and I think it still is the case that most people at the Institute hold it to be true – the differential was from purely audio inputs, so-called binaural beats as they are widely referenced today. However, since another separate study made by people from another, completely unconnected academic body, disclosed that air conduction headphones did not replicate the brain’s adding of differential hertz signals, whereas only the electronic headphone arrangement saw those changes occur – it is assertively said that the effect is an electromagnetic one only.

Now it is not, an electromagnetic one only, and that is because the human brain’s electromagnetic field strength and ability to respond or at least react at the neural network level, is measured at the microtesla level, which is very very small, relatively speaking, and it is more than conceivable although of course never yet researched anywhere here on Earth at the moment (maybe in China, secretly...) -, that complex coherent audio signals (EG like music) themselves drive human neural network spikes into the consequent development of commensurate EMF pulses.

This response as an obvious thing, may not necessarily always be found then, in just any audio signals even, but only those which drive complex repeating neural network ‘constellations’ of signalling inside the brain; and this will account for those certain other instances of air conduction headphones not producing the binaural brain effects. Then again, no doubt, even in electronic headphones, it is only the background or power ‘dithering’ wave that is really driving the 100 per cent constant binaural effects in the way that these are always obvious to the researcher’s instrumentation– and when the audio input is complex and contains many repeating ‘wave edge descents,’ then the binaural effects could be separately pronounced or indeed quite complex themselves, almost like the receipt of actual data, into the brain, by the brain rather than directly from external stimuli exclusively. And certainly, this underscores the validity of neural science’s thinking concerning what is now known as ‘Muller’s Law,’ about how the conscious individual really only ever experiences what is in their brain processing centres and not actually, what their physiological surfaces’ sensory ‘naked’ or raw data, says.

And this then raises the question as to whether there is or is not some prevailing pre-set template of ‘neural linguistics’ as it were (there certainly is, in terms of human thermal responses, diurnal parameters, the drowning reflex, lots of other ‘survival’ sensory instincts, colour perception, many ‘pre-sets’ in fact) that is able to make some kind of internal sense of complex binaural signals... In other words - for one interesting example – does higher, say classical music, provoke complex internal data de-coding as a form of complex binaural ‘logic’ from a pre-set human brain de-coding template?

When the logic basis overall is one that is firm on the ontology of objective logic (that it is there; does exist), then the possibility is there; and when objective truth, objective reality, and objective truth is moot however – as in the Karl Popper and Tavistock-style manipulating of social psychologies situations – then equivalently, any meaningful data sets derived from internal EMF neural responses is irrelevant or at least also ‘moot.’ Which is the reason such propaganda systems seek to dissuade you from accepting any objective reality. These wish to substitute your sovereign natural meaningfulness sensations, with their meanings.

Binaural brain effects can most definitely be objectively ‘observed’ by instruments, and these can certainly be filmed or photographed.

At our present level of understanding, we say that electromagnetic fields, are flows of magnet force, with a ‘north’ and a ‘south’ pole – and they are in the shape or form of an annulus. They ‘propagate’ at ninety degrees to the direction of flow of an alternating electrical current.

Under certain circumstances, you can ‘propagate’ an electromagnetic field in various parts, or at least, around various parts of your body, and this can certainly be ‘seen’ using sophisticated modern instrumentation.